“Do not dwell on assumption and expectations, bet the health of your BI environment on scientific checks and an official healt report annually” The Scientific Principles of Information Delivery, 2012
In part 1 of this paper we talked about standard health checks. The most
critical on of them is is the foundation of the methodology which is your
documented and communicated ‘Global BI Cookbook’
The additional recommendations of 'The Scientific Principles of Information Delivry', a book due for
release around Q3 of 2012 has the following new recommendations and caveats.
a.
Conduct a BI Health check every year to
‘information freeze’ risk: Crossword and puzzles are great for the brain, but
looking at the same report year after year can sometimes cause corporate tunnel
vision. While it is necessary to have some corporate reports that remain
strategically constant, it is still necessary to change reporting to suite
market changes. Being overweight doubles your risk of information freeze and
obesity quadruples it. The aim of all developments should be to keep your BI
healthy for the life of the organization. “If you do nothing but keep feeding
it garbage, the health of your BI has to deteriorate. According to Gartners
report more than 50% of global BI’s are genetically predisposed to the disease
of failure, just as 20% of Americans are predisposed to Alzheimer. An annual
check will prevent a brain-seizure that gets out of control or costs your
company millions of dollars to fix.
b.
Do not buy without alternatives analysis: Over the last year the
author has visited BI projects that installed BWA but did not need it,
Installed BOBJ but did it the wrong way, installed Teradata because their
Oracle DW was designed all wrong, and the list goes on and on. Common sense
mandates that when companies spend millions of dollars they conduct due
alternatives analysis. But the fact is that they do not. So when your current
initiative expires, or does not deliver in accordance to business expectations
then the basic foundations were wrong. Hire a BI Business Value Architect to
get this step right and save yourself and your company deep headaches
strategically.
c.
Watch the numbers very closely: The 10 week brain
seizurerisk assessment that’s been stated for ling may have been a BI paradigm
until 2010 but it is no longer so. BI Valuenomics solved that. If watching
numbers is elusive see ‘Moneyball’ the movie once again. ‘98% of BI projects are declared successful in week 1, yet less than
50% remain successful by week 10’ is a very numbers statement. Most
companies let their vendors go after 4 weeks of support and fall off the cliff
by week 10. Demand a 11 week support and things will change. Most BI
installations demand quantity and most of them risk major medical surgery
drowning in the numbers and gasping for quality. A recent study of may BI
installations demonstrated that the risk of brain-seizure decreased by over 40%
by simply applying the scientific principles of BVA (Business Value
Attainment). This was constant and not influenced by the amount of money the
company had invested into their BI initiative.
d.
Cosmetic surgery is never beneficial: The most
inefficient point to conduct
transformations is in the OLAP layer, yet over 80% of BI initiatives do it precisely
there. The reason for this is technocratic data modeling which believes in
collecting data as a means of information. This has been proven absolutely
erroneous and most inefficient. Three independent studies indicate that OLAP
transformation are most ineffecient tactically and strategically. “These
studies are not casual” say Alex Paleologoes from Hellenic Technologies, “It
degrades performance for all times, i.e. in its current state and even as you
apply accelerating technologies”, he
continued, “For example if your quesr takes 60 seconds for database, and 30
seconds for OLAP transforms and you install a BWA. With the BWA your database
access will go down to 1 second and your OLAP will still take 30 seconds. If
you install HANA your database access will take 0.05 seconds and your OLAP will
still take 30 seconds. So take care that your surgery is not cosmetic and
tactical only.
e.
Personalize your Fitness Plan: The Scientific
Principls guidelines now stress getting a fitness test between external partners
in BI Initiatives. The triad partners and their plans, IT and business
co-existance and the overall satisfaction ratings of each partner about every
other partner. Most BI projects start with great expectations, but less than
50% of them reach their destinations. Some companies offer Global BI Health
Checks , very much like you and I need metabolic rate analysis and fitness
tests annually. Wise folks take this seriously and avert major disasters, some
wiser ones feel it is a waste of time and effort to go for these annual expams
and we all know how their lives end. The goal has to become fit, more fit than
the competition, not just to go on a diet and loose weight. Being fit and fat
is far superior to being unfit and thin.
f.
Don’t stop your medication in the middle: Just like a lot of
patients stop taking their antibiotics midway, so too a lot of ‘smart’
executives stop following the advice of ‘BI Business Value Architects’ midway.
We were told of an inhouse oofshore operation in Poland where the IT confidence
in the group was at 16%. The author proposed a plan that would have taken them
in 1 years to over 85%. However, within 4 months the Polish management felt
then understood the scientific plans and stopped taking the medicine as they
reached 33% satisfaction. They felt they could now do it on their own and took
ownership. Penny wise pound foolish, because 16 months later they were still
languishing at 31% satisfaction.
g.
Before the cancer risk, reduce the heart
attack risk: As your queries become more and more slower your instant graticifation,
and triad recommendation, will be to go and install a BW Accelerator. However,
that will be an error for ‘it add little value to deliver reports, that
business does not need, this time only faster’, based on the fact that 40-60%
of the reports in your warehouse are useless trash. So before you go and spend
millions of dollars on the new Hummer try a little remodeling. It will possibly
meet your short term objectives and also slim your BI strategically for when
you actually need a BWA.
h.
If you don’t understand the problem get a
trusted expert: This is standad advice. If the recommendation is
something you are willing to bet your job and reputation on then go for it.
But, when it fails don’t go around pointing fingers, and firing , others. If in
doubt get a second opinion. Not all doctors out there are looking for your
good, some of them are also there to perform surgery on you even if you did not
need one – just to make a fast buck.
So in order to keep your BI healthy do the right things from a scientific
perspective, and not because some sales person convinced you into something
that may not be in the best interest of your BI environment.
No comments:
Post a Comment